Monday, August 20, 2012

Where are the Jobs...What can Government Really Do?


             Looking back over the 30 years that I ran a company that did precision machining of parts, technology changed the way we did business in fundamental way.  In the 1970’s, companies like mine had skilled machinists running manual machine tools.  These employees were hired into apprentice programs and over a period of about three years would advance to a journeyman machinist status.  The advent of computer numeric controlled machine tools changed all that.  The new machines were programmed to adjust spindle speeds, automatically change tools, and guide the cutting tools to shape the parts in an enclosed machine.  What was required then was a highly skilled setup man who could set and calibrate the tools and program the machine tool to run the part.  We no longer needed a skilled machinist to actually run the machine since all an operator had to do is load a part into the machine, close the door and press the cycle start button.  Our shop floors evolved into machine clusters or cells where one operator would run up to three machine tools. We would have a setup specialist to rotate around to set up the lathes and another setup specialist to setup the milling machines.

            The structure of our workforce then was two key employees who we paid the absolute top wages to ensure that they would stay with the company through thick and thin.  We had perhaps 12 to 15 machine operators that would run the machines in the cells but their skill set was such that we could train a new hire with a some mechanical ability to run machines in a matter of hours. They essentially had to load parts into the machines then unload the finished parts.  They would have to measure a few key dimensions on the parts and be able to make tooling offsets to compensate for tool wear. The implication of this structure on current trends in employment in the metal working industry should be obvious.  A small company can keep a small group of key people and cut employment back to the bone when hard times come. Our machine tools cost anywhere between $100,000 and $300,000 apiece and represent a significant investment on the part of a small businessman. When a recession hits and work dries up, the successful business owner will not buy new machine tools and he will lay off machine operators who are much easier to replace than his skilled setup men. When faced with uncertainties about employment costs such as health care cost increases or increased unemployment taxes to cover the massive pool of prolonged unemployed workers, the small business
owner can literally go to the mattresses. It is not uncommon for a company whose business is radically reduced to have office personnel run machines part time and even the owner will take a turn if it is required to have the business survive. I know because as the owner, I have made it a point to be able to setup, program and run any machine tool I had in my shop.

            Against this backdrop, what is the role of government in creating jobs? I have always maintained that the only role of government at any level is to create conditions that allow the private sector to create jobs.  We hear constantly about government job training programs but no matter how many of these programs the government tries to establish, they miss the mark.  I served as President of the local chapter of the National Tooling and Machining Association in Northwest Pennsylvania and one of my initiatives that I undertook with other business owners in our chapter was to create a teaching factory called the Precision Machining Institute.  We convinced machine tool manufacturers to provide us with state of the art machine tools to have on our floor to train our much sought after setup and programmer specialists on the most advanced technologies available.  We also made those machine tools available to the local shop owners to run jobs that they could not tackle on their machine tools they currently had on their shop floors.  In that way, shop owners could try out a machine tool by renting machine time at an hourly rate to develop a new customer or a new capability for the their operation.  The point is that this is a model that works, was developed by private industry and has served as a model for other such installations across the country. I would like the opportunity as your state representative to create training facilities like this in New Hampshire.

            In a nutshell, government can create the proper conditions for economic expansion by cutting taxes, allowing accelerated depreciation on expensive machinery utilized in the business or better yet allow the equipment to be expensed in the year it is purchased. The government should eliminate the minimum wage, quit meddling in health care and forget about government job training programs.  Government must establish reasonable tax policy and make it simple for companies to comply with and make it permanent.  Uncertainty is killing the economy now with temporary extensions of current tax rates, the questionable status of Obamacare, and the threat of massive tax increases on the so called rich who for the most part are small business owners that file their taxes as LLC corporations and hence flow their business income into their personal tax returns.  There is no way a small business like I had would buy a machine tool or hire anyone in this climate of uncertainty.

            The Republican pro business agenda for New Hampshire includes passing the Right to Work legislation that allows workers to choose whether they want to pay union dues, repealing the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) to lower energy costs for business and citizens, and increasing the income exemption from $150,000 to $200,000 before the Business Profit Tax takes effect.  If you elect me to the House of Representatives, I would support all three initiatives